The Lies We Inherit: Cognitive Bias in Genealogy
How our minds hide the truth long before history ever could.
Every family tree is a crime scene. The evidence lies, the witnesses are dead, and the investigator is you.
Genealogy pretends to be about truth, but it’s built on bias. We chase bloodlines like detectives chasing suspects, convinced the documents can’t deceive us. But records were written by survivors, edited by victors, and misread by the hopeful. The deeper you dig, the more you realize history isn’t what happened. It’s what was recorded, remembered, and repeated by people just as flawed as we are. Every ancestor we resurrect carries fingerprints of our own making.
Bias is the invisible hand that writes your family story for you.
As a genealogist, you’re not just sifting through records. You’re wrestling with human psychology, yours and everyone else’s. Every assumption, every hunch, every “this must be the same person” moment is a negotiation between evidence and ego. If you don’t recognize your cognitive biases, you stop being a researcher and start being a myth maker.
Here are the biases most likely to corrupt your tree:
1. Confirmation Bias
You find a record that feels right and stop digging. The name fits, the age works, and the story feels good. So you twist the evidence until it agrees with you. That’s how myths become facts. You want Great Grandpa to be the hero, so you ignore the wrong regiment, the wrong birthplace, the wrong wife. The cure isn’t cynicism. It’s discipline. Treat every perfect match like a suspect. The truth doesn’t need your belief. It needs your skepticism to survive.
2. Survivorship Bias
Genealogy favors the documented, not the deserving. Records remember soldiers, taxpayers, and landowners. They forget the poor, the displaced, the enslaved, the women without surnames. You end up telling a story of privilege instead of people. The truth of a family isn’t just who survived. It’s who didn’t.
3. Authority Bias
Just because it’s printed doesn’t make it true. County histories, family books, and Ancestry hints lie as easily as people. History was often written to impress, not confess. Authority bias makes you trust ink over instinct. The cure is brutal curiosity. Question everything, especially what looks official. Truth doesn’t need prestige. It needs proof.
4. Recency Bias
Modern data feels clean, but the past doesn’t live online. It lives in dust, in ink, in brittle paper that smells like mildew and time. You worship DNA results while ignoring ledgers written by hands that knew your bloodline personally. The farther back you go, the less convenient it gets. That’s where the gold is buried.
5. Surname Bias
A shared last name doesn’t mean a shared bloodline. You see a Douglas or a Lewis in the same county and decide fate did the paperwork. That’s how false trees spread like weeds. Coincidence loves to dress as kinship. Real research doesn’t assume. It proves something based on evidence.
6. Story Bias
Everyone wants a good story. That’s the problem. You find one hint of scandal and turn it into cinema. You fill gaps with imagination and call it insight. The truth doesn’t need makeup. It’s already strange, cruel, and beautiful enough. Let the facts speak. They’re louder than fiction.
7. Cultural Bias
We love to romanticize our origins. Every immigrant becomes brave, every settler noble. But most were just people flawed, frightened, and trying to survive. Cultural bias paints your lineage in pride until it stops being history and becomes propaganda. The real story lives in the dirt, not the anthem.
8. Gender Bias
Half your ancestors are missing because history forgot them. Women dissolve into maiden-name oblivion, erased by the paperwork of men. Genealogy is a graveyard of invisible mothers. Find them. They built the generations you’re chasing. Without them, your tree is half a ghost.
9. Survivorship of Data Bias (Survivorship Bias)
No record doesn’t mean no person. Fires, floods, and prejudice erased entire lives. The archives are full of silence. Don’t mistake it for emptiness. The lost outnumber the found. Genealogy isn’t about who you can prove. It’s about who you refuse to forget.
The Final Truth
Every bias is a thief. It steals accuracy, humility, and the raw beauty of what really happened. The goal isn’t to purge bias—you can’t. The goal is to see it, name it, and keep it from steering the story. Because genealogy isn’t just about finding your family. It’s about learning how to stop lying to yourself.
If this hit you in the gut, share it. Tag a researcher who needs a reminder to question their “proof.” Every myth we burn brings us one inch closer to the truth buried beneath the ink.
Receipts
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124–1131.
Elizabeth Shown Mills. Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace. 4th ed., Genealogical Publishing Co., 2023.
Board for Certification of Genealogists. Genealogy Standards. 2nd ed., Ancestry, 2019.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Beacon Press, 1995.
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, 2006.
Breen, T.H. and Stephen Innes. “Myne Owne Ground”: Race and Freedom on Virginia’s Eastern Shore, 1640–1676. Oxford University Press, 1980.
Smith, Bonnie G. The Gender of History: Men, Women, and Historical Practice. Harvard University Press, 1998.
Cook, Terry. “Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms.” Archival Science, vol. 13, no. 2–3, 2013, pp. 95–120.




Well done! The mindless clicking on Ancestry “Hints” and copying misinformation from tree to tree drive me crazy.
One ancestor in particular is credited as being a soldier in the Revolution, a “fact” promulgated, among others, by a woman seeking DAR membership. I got a copy of an old DAR application that had been accepted, but it was based on incorrect information, and the applicant wasn’t even his descendant, among other errors. I laid out all the evidence and shared it with the current seeker of membership. She shrugged it off and said he might qualify under DAR broad qualifications—supplying the army, giving a sermon supporting the patriots,etc, etc.
Great summary!